"That man Marples is up to too many tricks"

http://www.ecoplan.org/wtpp/general/monderman-details.htm
http://www.wormworks.com/roadwitch/pages/livingroom.htm --- not really a fan of this school of "traffic calming"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cul_de_sac >:-( grrr -- I get lost. If they all had connecting pedestrian exits, that would be OK.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffin_crossing <--- I want them!!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2678517.stm <-- more about Puffin Crossings
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/2/newsid_2840000/2840919.stm (source of my quote)
http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/insight/faqs/bicycle_facilities.htm separate bike facilities vs integrated roadways
http://www.google.com/maphp?notice=awkward-bike-stripes

thoughts percolating.

i'm looking for critiques of Monderman's signal-removal theory. the bios suggest that he recognizes limits -- signalless streets need to be complemented by a [presumably] access-controlled high-speed system. I'd like to know more of that.
of course the news articles are all shallow-view: "hey this magic idea is so wacky it just might work!".